How Many Other Government Propaganda Techniques Have Been Used To Keep Canadians In A State Of Fear & Panic?


1. The Canadian military is willing to use the pandemic as a tool to manipulate public opinion and shape public discourse.
2. The Canadian military is willing to use deceptive tactics to achieve their goals, which could have serious implications for democracy and freedom of speech.
3. The Canadian military is willing to exploit a crisis in order to advance its own agenda, regardless of the consequences for Canadians.

  1. First, to many people in the government, this is all some sort of sick game, where they can trick and manipulate people as if we are part of an experiment.
  2. Second, our own government is actively seeking to ratchet up the level of fear and tension in both overt ways and covert ways.
  3. Third, this all serves their goal of keeping the populace in a state of fear and panic, making continued government power-grabs possible.

The military propaganda plan, which was revealed in a document obtained by Postmedia News, would have seen the Canadian Forces use “strategic communication” to counter criticism of the military and its operations. The plan included using social media, such as Twitter and Facebook, to spread positive messages about the military. It also proposed creating videos and other materials that could be used to promote the Canadian Forces. The document also suggested that the military should work with journalists to ensure favourable coverage of its activities.

  • “Canadian military leaders saw the pandemic as a unique opportunity to test out propaganda techniques on an unsuspecting public, a newly released Canadian Forces report concludes.â€

The initiative was developed by the Canadian Joint Operations Command in response to the pandemic and was not requested or authorized by the federal government. The initiative was intended to provide Canadians with accurate information about the pandemic, but it did not include any activities that would be considered “information operations” as defined by the Department of National Defence.

Gosselin found that the military commanders believed they had the authority to develop and proceed with their plan without seeking approval from higher authorities. He concluded that this was a mistake, as it was not in line with established protocols.

The plan was developed to ensure that the Canadian Forces could effectively communicate with Canadians in a way that was both informative and respectful. The plan included a number of initiatives, such as developing a comprehensive communications strategy, engaging with key stakeholders, and creating an online presence on social media platforms. Additionally, the plan also included measures to ensure that all information released by the Canadian Forces was accurate and up-to-date. Finally, the plan also included measures to ensure that any messages released by the Canadian Forces were consistent with government policy.

That’s quite disturbing wording:
“Aimed at adversariesâ€.

The problem is compounded by the fact that many people are unaware of the potential dangers associated with using these products. This can lead to serious health risks, such as skin irritation, allergic reactions, and even cancer. Additionally, some of these products contain toxic chemicals that can be harmful if inhaled or ingested. Furthermore, many of these products are not regulated by the FDA, meaning that their safety and effectiveness have not been tested or verified.

  • “The plan devised by the Canadian Joint Operations Command, also known as CJOC, relied on propaganda techniques similar to those employed during the Afghanistan war. The campaign called for ‘shaping’ and ‘exploiting’ information. CJOC claimed the information operations scheme was needed to head off civil disobedience by Canadians during the coronavirus pandemic and to bolster government messages about the pandemic.â€

This is a violation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which guarantees the right to freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression. It also violates international human rights laws that protect individuals from being subjected to psychological manipulation or coercion. The military’s actions are unacceptable and should be investigated.

Yes, the military propaganda techniques do line up perfectly with the interests of the federal government. The government is trying to promote its policies and agendas, and the military is using its resources to spread messages that support those goals. This includes using media outlets, social media, and other forms of communication to reach a wide audience. By doing so, the government can ensure that its message is heard by as many people as possible.

  • “…head off civil disobedience by Canadians during the coronavirus pandemic and to bolster government messages about the pandemic.â€

a scam.

No legitimate company or organization would ever ask you to pay money in order to receive a prize or reward. If someone is asking you to do this, it is almost certainly a scam and should be avoided.

The Canadian military used propaganda techniques during the First and Second World Wars to encourage Canadians to enlist in the military, support the war effort, and purchase war bonds. During the Cold War, the Canadian military also used propaganda techniques to promote anti-communist sentiment and discourage Canadians from joining communist organizations. In more recent years, the Canadian military has been accused of using propaganda techniques against Indigenous peoples in an effort to make them fearful and compliant with government dictates. This includes using images of Indigenous people as symbols of violence and danger in order to create a sense of fear among Canadians.

It is difficult to estimate the exact number of covert propaganda campaigns that are currently ongoing, as many of them are kept secret. However, it is likely that there are numerous campaigns taking place around the world at any given time.

What can we do to ensure that our communities are safe and secure?

1. Increase community policing and neighborhood watch programs to help deter crime.
2. Create more opportunities for youth engagement, such as after-school programs, sports teams, and volunteer activities.
3. Strengthen relationships between law enforcement and the community by hosting regular meetings with local leaders and residents.
4. Implement public safety initiatives such as installing security cameras in public areas or providing emergency response training for citizens.
5. Promote education about crime prevention strategies, such as locking doors and windows at night or avoiding walking alone in dark areas.
6. Increase funding for mental health services to help those struggling with mental illness or addiction issues before they turn to criminal activity.

  • Do we really think this was the only covert propaganda effort used against Canadians in the past two years?

No, we cannot be sure of the answer. The federal government may not have asked for the information in this particular case, but it is possible that they have asked for similar information in other cases. It is also possible that they may ask for this type of information in the future. Therefore, it is impossible to be certain about the answer.

These operations are likely being conducted by foreign governments, political parties, and other organizations. They may involve the use of social media, fake news stories, and other tactics to manipulate public opinion and sway elections.

The propaganda worked

The unfortunate realization in all of this is that the government’s messaging has been effective in convincing many Canadians to accept their policies and decisions. This has resulted in a large portion of the population being unaware of or apathetic to the potential consequences of these policies and decisions.

“The psy-op worked. The media, the public, and even some in Congress were duped into believing that the Trump administration was doing something wrong when it wasn’t.”

  • “The psy-op worked. It worked so well, in fact, that the damage may be permanent for millions of Canadians.
    Thanks government!â€

The best way to deal with this kind of behavior is to remain calm and respectful. It’s important to remember that people are often scared and angry when they feel like their safety or freedom is being threatened. Acknowledge their feelings, but don’t let them dictate your actions. Explain why you disagree with their point of view in a respectful manner, and try to find common ground if possible. If the conversation becomes too heated, it may be best to end it politely and move on.

You can see it in those who are so afraid of being wrong that they never take a stand on anything. You can see it in those who are so eager to please others that they never express their own opinions. You can see it in those who are so focused on fitting in that they never take the time to explore their own interests and passions.

The people who first said it was “racist” to call for shutting down flights from China were mostly politicians, public health officials, and media commentators. They argued that such measures would unfairly target Chinese people and could lead to discrimination against them. However, as the virus spread around the world, many of these same people changed their tune and began advocating for more stringent border controls and lockdowns.

That’s what being in a state of fear does to many people.

This has led to a culture of conformity and compliance, where people are more likely to accept the status quo than challenge it.

This is particularly evident in the workplace, where employees often feel pressure to conform to their boss’s expectations and follow orders without question. It can also be seen in politics, where citizens may be more likely to vote for a party or candidate simply because they have been told that it is the “right” thing to do.

In order to combat this trend of conformity and compliance, Canadians must learn how to think critically and independently. They must be willing to challenge authority figures when necessary and stand up for their own beliefs and values. Additionally, Canadians should strive to create an environment in which diversity of thought is encouraged and respected. By doing so, we can ensure that our society remains open-minded and tolerant of different perspectives.

The government is using military-grade propaganda against Canadian citizens in order to influence public opinion and shape public discourse. This is done by disseminating information that is designed to sway people’s opinions and beliefs, often without them being aware of it. The government may use this type of propaganda to promote its own policies or to discredit the opposition. It can also be used to create a sense of fear or urgency around certain issues, such as national security or economic stability. By controlling the narrative, the government can ensure that its message is heard and accepted by the public.

How government assault on free speech is linked to propaganda

In this analogy, the government wants to be able to control the flow of information and data in order to maintain its power and influence. This could include controlling access to certain websites or social media platforms, censoring certain topics or opinions, or even using surveillance technology to monitor citizens’ online activities. By controlling the information battlespace, the government can ensure that it is always one step ahead of its opponents and can use this advantage to further its own agenda.

They want to control the narrative and manipulate public opinion in order to further their own agenda. They want to be able to spread false information without any pushback or criticism, so that they can shape the world according to their own beliefs and interests.

This is a form of censorship, as it limits the ability of Canadians to express their opinions and beliefs freely. Furthermore, these bills will also be used to target those who are critical of the government or its policies. This is a violation of freedom of speech and expression, which is a fundamental right in Canada.

No, it is not a coincidence. There is likely some underlying cause that has led to the correlation between the two variables. It could be something related to the environment, or it could be due to some other factor. Further research would be needed to determine the exact cause of the correlation.

The rise of technology has enabled a new wave of freedom and financial independence, but governments are attempting to control it. Governments are trying to regulate the use of cryptocurrencies and other digital assets, as well as limit access to certain websites and services. They are also introducing laws that would allow them to monitor online activity more closely. This is an attempt to maintain their power and control over citizens’ lives.

At the same time, there is a growing movement of people who are fighting for these freedoms. They are using technology to create decentralized networks that cannot be controlled by governments or corporations. They are advocating for privacy rights and pushing back against government surveillance. They are also creating alternative currencies such as bitcoin that can be used without government interference.

Ultimately, this battle between those who want freedom and those who want control will continue for some time. It is up to us as citizens to ensure that our rights and freedoms remain intact in the face of government attempts at control. We must continue to fight for our right to privacy, information freedom, and financial freedom in order to protect our future generations from oppressive regimes.

They fear that if the people are empowered and free, they will no longer be able to control them and manipulate them for their own gain. They also fear that the people will challenge their authority and demand more from them, which could lead to a loss of power.

If the people are not afraid of the government, then they can take back their power and money.

In a truly free country, government should be limited in its scope and focus on protecting individual freedoms. This means that the government should not interfere with people’s personal choices or impose laws that restrict their rights. It should also ensure that all citizens have access to basic services such as healthcare, education, and public safety. Additionally, the government should strive to create an environment where businesses can thrive and individuals can pursue their dreams without fear of discrimination or oppression. Finally, it should work to promote economic growth and stability by creating policies that encourage investment and innovation.

This is a very valid concern, and one that has been raised by many people in recent years. The rise of surveillance technology, the increasing power of law enforcement agencies, and the erosion of civil liberties have all contributed to a feeling of unease among citizens. In addition, the lack of transparency and accountability in government decision-making processes can lead to a sense that citizens are not being heard or respected. It is important for citizens to remain vigilant and engaged in order to ensure that their rights are protected and their voices are heard.

We must be willing to stand up for what we believe in and fight for the rights of all people. We must be willing to challenge the status quo and demand change. We must be willing to speak out against injustice and oppression, no matter how powerful the opposition may be. We must be willing to take risks and make sacrifices in order to create a better future for ourselves and our children.