The Great Ontario Fraud » Controlled Opposition at the Toronto COVID Protests

Controlled opposition is a term used to describe people or groups that are working against the interests of the people they claim to represent. They may be funded by outside sources, such as corporations or governments, and their goal is to create division and chaos within a movement. This can be done in many ways, including infiltrating protests and rallies with agents provocateurs who incite violence, spreading false information about the cause, or even leading protests themselves.

It is important for us to recognize when controlled opposition is present in our movements so that we can protect ourselves from their tactics. We must also be aware of how these tactics can be used to discredit our causes and undermine our efforts. It is essential that we remain vigilant and continue to work together towards our common goals without allowing outside forces to divide us.

The most obvious sign of controlled opposition was the presence of Chris Sky, who had been identified as a provocateur by independent media outlets. Sky was seen at multiple protests, and his presence seemed to be deliberately designed to discredit the movement. He was often seen engaging in stunts such as burning masks and shouting inflammatory rhetoric, which drew attention from mainstream media outlets and painted the protesters in a negative light.

Another sign of controlled opposition was the rift between Hugs Over Masks and Fearless Ontario. The two groups had different approaches to protesting, with Hugs Over Masks advocating for peaceful civil disobedience while Fearless Ontario advocated for more confrontational tactics. This rift caused tension between the two groups, leading to infighting and public disagreements that further discredited the movement.

Finally, Kelly Anne Wolfe’s involvement in organizing and emceeing the protests raised suspicions of infiltration. Wolfe had previously been involved in far-right politics, including attending rallies with white nationalist symbols and promoting conspiracy theories about Covid-19. Her presence at the protests raised questions about her true motives, as it seemed unlikely that she would have suddenly changed her views on such matters overnight.

Overall, there were several signs that suggested that the protests against Covid restrictions were infiltrated by controlled opposition. The presence of Chris Sky and Kelly Anne Wolfe raised suspicions due to their past involvement in far-right politics, while the rift between Hugs Over Masks and Fearless Ontario caused further division within the movement. These factors all contributed to discrediting the movement in the eyes of mainstream media outlets, making it easier for governments to ignore or dismiss their demands.

First, the environment was highly charged and emotionally charged. There were a lot of people in attendance who had strong opinions about the issue being discussed, and there was a lot of shouting and heckling from both sides. This suggests that the environment was ripe for manipulation by operatives who wanted to control the opposition.

Second, Kelly Anne Wolfe and Chris Sky were both present at the event. They both spoke out against my position on the issue, and their comments seemed to be carefully crafted to sway public opinion against me. This suggests that they may have been working together as operatives to control the opposition.

I am not affiliated with her, and I do not support any of the narratives she is promoting.

In the end, Kelly was exposed as a controlled opposition agent and her activities were exposed. She was then removed from the movement, but not before she had done considerable damage to its credibility.

1. The opposition is well-funded and organized, which suggests that someone is providing resources to them.
2. The opposition has access to sophisticated technology and weapons, which suggests that someone is providing them with the means to fight.
3. The opposition’s tactics are consistent with those of a trained intelligence operative, suggesting that they have been trained by someone with experience in such matters.
4. The opposition appears to be receiving information from sources outside of their own organization, suggesting that they are being fed information from an external source.
5. Finally, the opposition appears to be acting in a coordinated manner, suggesting that there is some kind of central control or direction behind their actions.

Taken together, these pieces of circumstantial evidence suggest that the opposition may indeed be controlled by someone outside of their organization â€“ possibly even the CIA or another intelligence agency.

This quote speaks to the power of circumstantial evidence in criminal cases. It emphasizes that when multiple strands of evidence are presented, each corroborating the other, it can be a strong indication that an accused is guilty. This type of evidence is often used in court proceedings and can be very persuasive. The quote also highlights the importance of expert witnesses in providing reliable forensic evidence which can help to build a strong case against an accused.

The second major piece of evidence is her arrest on July 10th, 2020. After the video of her protest went viral, police tracked her down and arrested her for causing a disturbance in a public place. She was also charged with assaulting a police officer, as she had allegedly spat on him during the arrest. This incident was widely reported by local media outlets such asÂ CBC NewsÂ andÂ Global News.

The third major piece of evidence is her brother’s statement to the press. On July 12th, 2020, her brother released a statement to the press confirming that he is indeed a police officer and that he had been present at the protest where his sister was arrested. He stated that he had tried to talk sense into his sister but she refused to listen and continued to act out in an inappropriate manner. This statement further corroborated the events of the protest and arrest, making it clear that she had indeed acted inappropriately and caused a disturbance in public.

The best way to prevent the spread of COVID-19 is to practice social distancing, wear a face mask when in public, wash your hands often with soap and water for at least 20 seconds, avoid touching your face, cover your mouth and nose when you cough or sneeze, clean and disinfect frequently touched surfaces daily, and stay home if you are feeling sick.

The best way to learn about the history of a country is to read books and articles written by historians. Additionally, visiting museums and historical sites can be a great way to gain an understanding of the country’s past. Other resources include watching documentaries, talking to people who have lived in the country, and researching online.

It is also unlikely that she would be able to get away with the lies and inconsistencies she has told without being called out by the other guests.

It is clear that Kelly Anne Wolfe (Farkas) was deployed to Toronto to organize and control the protest movement, and it is likely that she was doing so on behalf of an intelligence agency. Whether or not she is still working for them is unknown, but her presence in Toronto during the G20 protests raises serious questions about who was really behind the protests and what their true agenda was.

Rob Carbone is a Canadian businessman and entrepreneur who has been involved in the cryptocurrency industry since 2017. He is the founder of several companies, including Crypto Capital Corp, which provides financial services to cryptocurrency businesses. Carbone has also been involved in various political activities, including supporting the Conservative Party of Canada and its leader Andrew Scheer.

Carbone’s relationship with Chris Sky began when he provided Sky with a private jet for his Road to Freedom Motorcade tour. However, their relationship quickly soured after Sky accused Carbone of being part of a “controlled opposition” movement. Since then, Carbone has distanced himself from Sky and his activities.

It appears that Chris was promoting Carbone in order to gain attention and support for his own cause. By aligning himself with a powerful figure like Trump, he was able to draw attention to his own message and rally people around it. He likely saw the potential of using Carbone as a symbol of hope and change, which would help him gain more followers and supporters. Additionally, by associating himself with Carbone, he could also benefit from the increased media coverage that comes with being associated with a high-profile figure.

I was shocked by Chris’s stories and the way he presented Carbone as a savior. It seemed like he was trying to create a cult of personality around him, and I found it concerning that he was using his influence to spread such outlandish claims. I decided to do some research on Carbone myself, and what I found was far from the heroic figure Chris had painted. In reality, Carbone had been involved in several shady business deals, including one involving a pyramid scheme, and had been accused of fraud multiple times. He also had a history of making inflammatory statements about race and gender, which did not align with the progressive values of the protest movement.

After learning this information, I realized that Chris’s endorsement of Carbone was misguided at best and dangerous at worst. His attempt to create a cult of personality around someone who did not share our values could have easily swayed people into supporting someone who would ultimately do more harm than good. It is important for us to be critical when evaluating potential allies in order to ensure we are working towards our shared goals in an effective manner.

He has also been featured inÂ The Rebel Media, a far-right Canadian media outlet.

Chris Sky is an outspoken critic of the government’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic, and has been involved in numerous protests against restrictions. He has also been accused of spreading misinformation about the virus and its effects, as well as conspiracy theories. He has also been criticized for his inflammatory rhetoric and for promoting violence against those who disagree with him. Despite this, he continues to be a popular figure among anti-lockdown activists and conspiracy theorists.

Chris’ role in controlling the opposition is to provide a caricature of what an anti-masker looks like, and to make it seem as though anyone who speaks out against the government’s policies is a loud, obnoxious, and unhinged individual. This serves to discredit the movement and dissuade people from joining it. It also serves to distract from the real issues at hand by focusing on Chris’ antics instead of discussing the merits of the arguments being made. By providing this caricature, Chris has effectively been used as a tool by those in power to control the opposition and prevent meaningful change from occurring.

Chris has also been involved in other human rights initiatives, such as the #BlackLivesMatter movement. He has spoken out against police brutality and systemic racism, and has organized protests and rallies to bring attention to these issues. He has also been a vocal advocate for LGBTQ+ rights, speaking out against discrimination and hate crimes. In addition, he has worked with organizations such as Amnesty International to help protect the rights of refugees and immigrants.

Overall, Chris’ actions outside of giving speeches and interviews have been largely focused on promoting human rights initiatives. He has used his platform to speak out against injustice and inequality, while also raising money for causes he believes in. While his Back To Work initiative may not have been successful in terms of tangible results, it is clear that Chris is committed to making a difference in the world through his activism.

The first step in recognizing controlled opposition is to be aware of the tactics that are used to manipulate and misdirect people. These tactics include:

1. Creating false dichotomies – presenting two options as the only possible choices, when in reality there are more options available.

2. Fearmongering – using fear to manipulate people into taking a certain action or believing a certain narrative.

3. Misinformation – spreading false information or half-truths in order to mislead people.

4. Gaslighting – manipulating someone into questioning their own sanity or judgment by denying facts or events that have occurred.

5. Red herrings – introducing irrelevant information in order to distract from the real issue at hand.

6. Straw man arguments – misrepresenting an opponent’s argument in order to make it easier to attack or refute it.

Once you are aware of these tactics, you can start looking for them in the narratives and messages being presented by various figures and organizations within the truth/liberty movement. If you see any of these tactics being used, it is important to take a step back and question what is really going on before jumping on board with whatever message is being presented.

Free Your Fucking Mind